use-cases

Site context renders with Krea 2

The Krea Team ·
Site context renders with Krea 2

Photoreal contemporary infill building inserted between two historic European facades

The hardest render in architecture is the one with neighbours. A standalone building on a clean lot is easy. The same building between two existing facades, with real foot traffic and the actual streetscape, is the render a planning committee actually wants to see.

Krea 2 handles site context renders with real photo-grade accuracy. Upload a photo of the site, describe the proposed building, and the model returns a render that respects the surroundings. This article walks through the workflow with four common site types.

How it works

  1. Take or source a photograph of the actual site — empty lot, existing structure to replace, or surrounding context.
  2. Upload the photograph as an image reference in Krea 2.
  3. Write a tight prompt describing the proposed building — form, materials, scale, height, ground-floor activation.
  4. Generate. The model preserves the surroundings and inserts the proposed building.

Urban infill between historic neighbours

The classic planning-committee request: show what your proposed building looks like next to the buildings that already exist.

Empty infill lot, before and after

Site photo of the empty lot, and the proposed contemporary infill building inserted between historic neighbours.

The prompt that did the insertion: “Photoreal architectural rendering of a contemporary five-story residential infill building inserted between two existing historic European apartment buildings, warm masonry facade with modern proportions, midday overcast lighting, professional architectural visualization.”

Hillside residential with view

For private residential clients on a hillside lot, the questions are: how does the building sit on the slope, and how does it relate to the view? A site photo answers the first; the prompt answers the second.

Hillside lot, before and after

Empty hillside site, and the proposed contemporary villa inserted onto the slope.

Tight urban corner

A corner lot in a dense block — the kind of site where the surrounding buildings dictate height, setbacks, and ground-floor program.

Urban corner, before and after

Empty corner lot in a mid-rise urban block, and the proposed twelve-story tower inserted into the same context.

Aerial context

For master-planning and community engagement, the aerial render does work no street-level shot can do — it shows scale, density, and relationship to the surrounding neighbourhood.

Aerial render of a new community center inserted into a suburban neighbourhood block

Prompt that works: “Photoreal aerial architectural rendering of a new contemporary community center inserted into a suburban neighbourhood block, surrounded by existing detached houses and tree-lined streets, midday clear light, professional architectural visualization in real site context.”

Prompt patterns that work for site context

  • Lead with the existing context. “Inserted between two historic apartment buildings,” “on a Pacific coast slope,” “into a busy urban block.” Naming the context first orients the model to respect it.
  • Specify what stays. “Existing buildings unchanged,” “preserve the neighbouring facades,” “no changes to the surrounding street trees.” The model will preserve more when you ask explicitly.
  • Use real site photographs. Generic site prompts produce generic sites. A real photo as a reference grounds every detail in the actual conditions.
  • Match the time of day to the site photo. If the site photo is overcast, prompt for overcast lighting. Time-of-day mismatches between the existing context and the proposed building break the illusion.
  • Add people at the right density. Empty streets read as renders. Crowded streets read as 6pm Friday. Match the density to the moment you want to depict.

Where this fits in a project

Site context renders are the deliverable for two specific moments:

  1. Pre-application planning meetings. Before you submit drawings, you show the committee what the building will look like in context. A persuasive site context render is the difference between a hostile review and a routine one.
  2. Community engagement. Public consultation requires images real residents can understand. Plans and elevations are not enough. A photoreal site context render is.

Render your next site in Krea 2

Free to start. Image references and Krea Edit included on every plan.

Open Krea 2

Frequently asked questions

Will Krea 2 preserve the actual surrounding buildings?
Yes, with the right prompt. Use the site photograph as an image reference, prompt for the proposed building specifically, and add "existing buildings unchanged" to lock the surroundings. For high-stakes planning renders, run the result through [Krea Edit](/edit) to lock any specific neighbouring details that drifted.
What if I only have a Google Street View image?
Google Street View images work as reference inputs, but the model output will only be as accurate as the input. For planning-grade renders, a higher-resolution site photo is better.
Can I do this for projects in the planning phase before I have a final design?
Yes — and this is exactly when site context renders are most useful. Generate quick versions with three or four massing options to align the client and the planners before committing to a final design.
Will this hold up in front of a planning committee?
For most committees, yes. Krea 2's photoreal output is indistinguishable from traditional visualization renders at presentation resolution. For committees that require visualizations from a specific vendor or with formal accuracy documentation, generate the render in Krea 2 first to align stakeholders, then commission the formal visualization for the official submission.
Can I use this for shadow studies or solar analysis?
No. Krea 2's lighting is photoreal but not solar-accurate. For shadow studies and solar analysis, use a proper visualization tool with site coordinates. Krea 2 is for the persuasive render, not the technical one.